cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 11 days agoJunior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkJunior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 11 days agomessage-square53fedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squareOrvorn@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·11 days agoSomeone should invent some kind of database of syntax, like a… code
minus-squareheavydust@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·11 days agoBut it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·11 days agoWe don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.
minus-squarepeoplebeproblems@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 days agoThat’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
minus-squareNatanael@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up0·11 days agoHow to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
minus-squaremaiskanzler@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-210 days agoPeople could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.
Someone should invent some kind of database of syntax, like a… code
But it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
A codegrammar?
We don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.
That’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
How to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
People could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.