Bluesky, which uses it, has been opened to federation now, and the standard basically just looks better than ActivityPub. Has anyone heard about a project to make a Lemmy-style “link aggregator” service on it?

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Really? In what way?

    Digital identities being cryptographic and independent of any one instance is huge all on it’s own. The rest of it I understand less clearly, but it looks pretty modular.

    • gandolfini_the_grey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      See here. Basically, creating a relay for the AT protocol is extremely costly and only possible for big tech companies with lots of investors.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Thank you!

        TL;DR, the relay bit works as a completely connected network topology, and has the associated quadratic growth issues, which renders it hard to host.

        Also nasty: Direct messages are just not federated.

        Other things are or were at the time of writing janky, but nothing else is quite that egregious. The author is working on a separate project, and recommends this idea as a solution for portable identity on ActivityPub, and here’s what “object capability” means.

    • ericjmorey@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The data is not centralized, but everyone is using the same aggravation service (indexer) to access the data.