• Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    159
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Damn, Brother was the only company left I was happy to blind purchase from by name alone.

    • nyandere@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      5 days ago

      Brother’s been anti-consumer for at least 5 years now. Not sure why people are just learning about it now.

      Brother blocking 3rd party toner was the primary reason why I went with Canon back in 2020.

    • Noedel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Just buy an ink tank printer, it fixes 90 percent of your printer grief

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ve had an Epson Ecotank for the last couple years and I have no complaints. I just refilled my black ink and it was $11 for 9 oz., which should last me years (but I don’t print that often).

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      77
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      You actually can’t sell third-party printers legally, because all printers will include an ink fingerprint which can be traced back to that specific printer. So if someone prints a ransom note or counterfeits cash with it, the FBI will be knocking on their door by the end of the day.

      There’s literally a certification process to be allowed to sell printers, and one of the biggest criteria for that certification is agreeing to maintain that fingerprint database. One of the other big criteria is that the printer needs to be able to recognize and refuse to print images of cash, to prevent counterfeiting. If you try to print an image of a dollar bill, the printer’s firmware will refuse to continue the print job. The issue is that this certification process also ensures there’s a de facto near duopoly on printers, which leads to BS like HP making it increasingly difficult to use affordable ink. They can be blatantly anti-consumer, because they’re protected from any competition.

      There’s a reason HP hasn’t already been priced out by some cheap Chinese competitor who is able to undercut the competition. And it’s not because of the difficulty in manufacturing or the price of components. It’s because no other companies are allowed to sell printers.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Inside the US, sure. That just means you don’t get the cool FOSS printer.

      • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        You make it sound like a huge conspiracy but there are laws and regulations around everything you try to sell, especially for electronics.

        You also have to do EMF radiation testing, ensure that your printer doesn’t produce toxic aerosols or fumes, and probably a bunch of other things to prove that your product is safe. I don’t see why the fingerprinting isn’t just another thing on the list of things you have to do to be in compliance with the rules. If your company is capable of producing something as complex as a printer, encoding the device’ serial number into a bunch of yellow microdots that you add to the printout shouldn’t be an issue.

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          ensure that your printer doesn’t produce toxic aerosols or fumes

          But they do? I literally got sick after i spent a day in a small room with a big office printer. And each printer makes my skin itchy, if printing in close proximity.

      • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 days ago

        May I have the legal text, of any country, requiring a certification to sell any printers, or have EURion contellation dection implemented, or legally required to implement tracking dots?

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        We have great examples of things sold as parts or kits to be assembled

        Take handguns as an example. If a murder weapon can be assembled from parts with only the frame 3d printed, and avoid similar laws for traceability, surely a printer is an easier task

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        You actually can’t sell third-party printers legally, because all printers will include an ink fingerprint which can be traced back to that specific printer.

        All color printers.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    5 days ago

    I no longer have any corporate relationships that aren’t either apprehensive, strained, or downright antagonistic.

    It’s us versus them now and they’ve give their last shits. It’s feeling like every company is a cable company now.

    • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      5 days ago

      Always has been like that.

      Not one single corporation is your friend or wants to be. All they want is your money. No exceptions.

      • tiramichu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Companies were never our friends, but it used to be the case that companies sold products. They sold a product and you got to use it and that was the end of it.

        Now instead, thanks largely to the Internet, companies barely care about ‘product’ at all and instead are all trying to get in on that gravy train of monetised data slurping, subscription models, DRM on every consumable, firmware updates that change the terms on you after the fact, and so on. Every electronic thing in your home is now super hostile to you.

        TVs, printers, fridges. These products used to be just products, but now they are trojan horses.

        • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 days ago

          This shift in business model also means a drop in customer service. They used to sell you a product and stand behind it because eventually they wanted you to choose them when you needed a new or different product. Now that they have you roped in via a sort of forced dependency, they don’t have to pretend to be nice to you even.

          • tiramichu@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            Exactly. The way to make money pre-Internet was “generate repeat business” and the way to do that was to create a product and service the customer was happy with.

            The way to make money now is to get the customer trapped, then pump them as hard as possible.

          • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            The last step is to put us all in prison and mandate we purchase their product (produced in the prison) from them while earning 69 cents an hour.

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      I have VERY few and I cherish them.

      Fairphone feels great to me. I think My coffee stuff is the same (Profitec, Eureka Mignon); no app or wifi or anything, fairly available spare parts.

        • frank@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Sure did. Repairable ones. I strongly prefer wired headphones and will keep using them as I can, and I ain’t buying earbuds.

          But I’d rather not let perfect be the enemy of good. I am not giving up a cellphone, so I’d rather have Fairphone trying (ans sometimes fucking it up) than give my money to anyone else in the market.

          Them not being perfect in my eyes doesn’t qualify as a hostile relationship between their corporation and me.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Now i had to put on the in-ears, hook up to phone to… listen to a guy talking. -_-

    Short summary: after he got a firmware update, the MFC 3750 of Louis Rossman prints in worse quality with aftermarket ink.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 days ago

    I rarely use a printer now that my kids are in college. When it dies, I had a choice between laser printer, Brother inkjet, or none. “None” is now my first choice

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s what we did.

      For the few pages we need to print, I can use the machine at the library for $0.10/page.

      • comfydecal@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        4 days ago

        So issue here is privacy, the library is likely scanning whatever device connected, not just the files and file metadata

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 days ago

          Seriously? The library computers are running Windows 8 I highly doubt they have the technical expertise to do anything. Also why would they?

          • comfydecal@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yeah, with the Vault 7 releases and recent leaks showing NSA follows homeless people’s connections (who tend to hang out at libraries due to a lack of 3rd spaces), I don’t doubt there’s specific tracking, malware and other unwanted software at libraries. I don’t have any sources of this, but it wouldn’t surprise me

            Maybe I’m overly parandoid because ::gestures at everything::

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          I trust the library a lot more than I trust Staples or a similar for-profit business.

  • Viri4thus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Capitalism is the breeding ground of parasitism. The incentive structures needs to change. Good corporate governance and long term sustainability need to trump short term turnover and fiduciary role to always go up. As it exists, corporate incentive structures promote leadership by psychopaths that will go to the utmost consequence to drive the last cent out of their customers. This is especially true in the US, which by virtue of competition, metastasises to the entire western world.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      Its been doing that for 50+ years. But just like how capitalism expects growth, the trend is exponential.

  • Cocopanda@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    When I saw this title. I thought another YouTube hardware advocate turned their back on Louis and started an anti-consumer group to fight off policy debate that Louis does. My brain is wild.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    “Bröther, please dö nöt becöme anti-cönsümer!”

    “I töö yearn för the cöntrölled mönöpöly, thë ensittificätiön, the röt ecönömy!”

    “Brother…”

    “I’m leäving töö müch möney on thë täblë! We also hävë öür men Ëlön Müsk as thë shädöw prësidënt, Trümp ïs jüst hïs, ör räthër - öür püppët. Hë wïll dïsmänlë äll cönsümër prötëctïons, as thëy’re in thë wäy öf öür pröfits.”

    “Bröthër… Plëäsë rëcönsïdër!”

    “Änd whät ärë yöü gönnä dö if not? Go tö thë cönsümer prötection agencies Ëlön Müsk’s DÖGË jüst dïsmäntlëd? Üse an öld HP LaserJet until yöü cän get repläcemënt rollers för it? You know öther parts öf it cän brëäk töö.”

    “Bröther… You became… ËVÏL! You betrayed EVERYTHING you previously stood for!”

    “And Ï wïll dö it as mäny tïmes as nëëded. Ëvil? It’s jüst büsïnëss. Mäybë yöü shöüld hävë rëcönsïdërëd yöür vötë för Trümp.”

    “Bröther… Büt thë tränsës hävë cäncëlled Pikamëë för thë wïzärd gämë! The wökenëss häve been deströying the gäme ïndüstry! I nëëded tö vötë för Dönäld Trümp! Why isn’t it wörkïng äs ït wäs süppösëd tö!”

    “Yöü vötëd ägäïnst yöür cläss interest öut öf püre hatred. I like ït vërÿ müch! Yöü knöw önë rëäsön she wäs älsö cäncelled wäs düë tö lölï? Ï dön’t think Pröjëct 2025 wïll ällöw it för sö löng düë tö tötäl pörn ban!”

    “PLEÄSE BRÖTHËR, NÖT THE LÖLÏ! PLEÄSE LET ME KEEP THË CÜTË ÄND FÜNNŸ!”

    “Yöü vöted against yöür class interest, yöür personal interest… hahahahahaHAAHAHAHAHAAAA! Yöür sö fünny! Ÿöü’rë thë përfëct vötër för më! Ÿöü’rë thë përfëct cönsümër ëvën! Töö dümb tö rëälïzë äll thë pöliticäl wörkings aröünd yöürself. Änd when anything göes wröng, yöü bläme the minörities öf this söciety. Nöw get exited för Bröther AI, a sübscriptiön service which is essentiäl för öperating the printer! Get ready för price hikes! Get ready för shörter lasting printers!”

    “You’re truly despicable bröther!”

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    5 days ago

    Okay, so after reading this, they’re not specifically degrading print quality, they’re just making you do the alignment manually. This is probably legal, but still scummy.

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    O, damnit. Not the last bastion of hope!

    Edit: 100% serious. Like Rossmann, Brother was the go-to brand.