• FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well, now, I guess all the people who like to lecture me every time the topic of Brave comes up will just chill the f*** out now.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Naw brother (or friend if I’m being too presumptuous), they’re just going to double down on being hypocritical.

      Now theyll pull out all the things that Brave did most of a decade ago to stay afloat and laud it over you like it’s not something mozilla’s got on the table right now.

      But their crypto… but their search… But that seven-million dollar moz CEO isn’t going to pay for himself either.

      Brave is going to sell my shit. That was never in question. But knowing that up front I don’t give them anything that I want to play close to the heart.

      Firefox has a fuckton on everone that they’ve had for ages that they can now sell because they changed their business model.

      And sure we can turn telemetry off if we haven’t already, But how long do you think that feature is going to work as intended once it’s the only thing paying their top man to stay.

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 hours ago

        It would be hypocritical if they said something is not an issue when Firefox does it, that they criticise Brave about.

        What I’m seeing here is everyone is up with pitchforks against Firefox, so looks like they are applying their rules consistently.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I see so that’s why this person has negative 30 upvotes for mentioning they hope people will leave them alone for using a different browser…

          • dev_null@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            My guess is that they got downvoted because their comment makes no sense, while being angry about it.

            If people were criticising their usage of Brave, why would they stop now? It makes no sense. Firefox getting worse doesn’t make Brave any better. People who disliked it will still dislike it and people who liked it will still like it.

            He is right to be annoyed about getting lectured, but it’s silly to think that this news about a different, unrelated browser has any bearing on it.

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Person A->Person B: Doing X is stupid you shouldn’t do X you should do Y

              Person A: Y is now X. Person A is now doing X.

              Person B:-> I can finally stop having people bitch about me doing X

              Person A: Nuh uh X is stupid

              How’s that comment makes no sense break down in logical terms?

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      no, see, while mozilla may be monetizing its user base, we know brave is.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        But we’ve always known that Brave is and if we put any information into it it was because we were okay with that.

        Now you’ve got a whole lot of people that have a whole lot of information swimming around and MOZ changes their business plan…

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        No, they’re saying that people have been shittong on them for years for using Brave, now that the Firefox people are in the same boat maybe they’ll stop shitting on them.

        Looks at thread Nope, people are just going to shit harder.

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            It has always been the case with brave it’s not that it happened or didn’t happen They never alluded that it wouldn’t so we knew not to put anything there. People have been adding stuff to Firefox for ages and now the business model is changing.

            Hell if anything that puts Firefox a little worse off at the moment

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Discovering that arsenic ingestion is bad for you doesn’t make your ingestion of cyanide better.

    • s38b35M5@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Its a sad day for sure, when the example of privacy and user respect just… Isn’t anymore.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        People are just largely naive. Your privacy, at least since 2001, has always been in your own hands. (Not unlike how, if you don’t want to get a virus, you’re stuck moderating your own behavior, as the community around you is largely careless.)

        • Flagstaff@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          A comparison to malware isn’t quite accurate because in this case, the software itself is already attacking you when it ideally should be neutral.