Firefox maker Mozilla deleted a promise to never sell its users’ personal data and is trying to assure worried users that its approach to privacy hasn’t fundamentally changed. Until recently, a Firefox FAQ promised that the browser maker never has and never will sell its users’ personal data. An archived version from January 30 says:

Does Firefox sell your personal data?

Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed to protect your privacy. That’s a promise.

That promise is removed from the current version. There’s also a notable change in a data privacy FAQ that used to say, “Mozilla doesn’t sell data about you, and we don’t buy data about you.”

The data privacy FAQ now explains that Mozilla is no longer making blanket promises about not selling data because some legal jurisdictions define “sale” in a very broad way:

Mozilla doesn’t sell data about you (in the way that most people think about “selling data”), and we don’t buy data about you. Since we strive for transparency, and the LEGAL definition of “sale of data” is extremely broad in some places, we’ve had to step back from making the definitive statements you know and love. We still put a lot of work into making sure that the data that we share with our partners (which we need to do to make Firefox commercially viable) is stripped of any identifying information, or shared only in the aggregate, or is put through our privacy preserving technologies (like OHTTP).

Mozilla didn’t say which legal jurisdictions have these broad definitions.

  • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    The screw-ups keep mounting like they want to be Google.

    They (and we)'ve got to admit, the solution is not going to come from within their (managerial) ranks.

    At this point I’d be happy to offer my services as a BDFL for Mozilla, at but a small fraction of the wages of any of their C-suites.

  • NullHippo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    They’re cash strapped and cash strapped companies are the worst when it comes to being trustworthy. That’s all the calculus that needs to be done.

  • RangerJosey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Google really needs to be broken up. They’ve become the Ma Bell of the internet.

  • ChonkaLoo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t like this but it’s gonna take more for me to switch. I am very happy with Firefox for my use-case and workflow it works really well. However I think they are shooting themselves in the foot by starting to take away some of the most crucial advantages with Firefox compared to Chrome. I mean if both are awful for privacy then why use Firefox?

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Mind you, this is just step one and other steps WILL follow. Mozilla looked at other enshittified products from large companies that make a lot of money and thought “we could have that too!”

      It’s a pattern I keep seeing, over and over. This is the end of Firefox as we knew it. I’m sure a good fork, run by a non profit foundation will sprout soon enough, but the name for a privacy browser won’t be Firefox no more

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Maybe. I’ll certainly check out alternatives, but I’m not panicking just yet. It’s not hard to switch browsers, so I’ll just test out options while seeing how things shake out.

    • And009@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      And what they say about being commercially viable is true, they can’t die on this hill. It means death of complete privacy either way.

      • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Mozilla are a non profit organisation. Their recent blog post says that they will invest in advertising to increase short-term revenue that they need to “grow”. The blog goes on to talk about the increase in board members, and new leaders being added. The CEO and these new leaders are highly paid…

        To me this looks bad. It looks to me that Mozilla’s new leaders have pushed out the old; and are now moving towards advertising and selling user data not because they need it to stabilise and survive, but because they need it to pay the people making the decision to burn trust and reputation. It has become a top-heavy organisation, and greed has seeped in.

        A few people will be self-enriched by this, and then the orgasation will be weaker as a result.

        • And009@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Another decade and we’ll be back inside libraries, let’s stock up on epubs while we still have internet browsing.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you’re going to a Chromium browser, at least go to Vivaldi since it’s a) based on Chromium not Chrome and b) not based in the US.

      The only bad thing it has going for it is that it uses the Chrome web store for extensions.

      • zeca@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        VIvaldi is cool, but its not open source. If you worry about the trustworthiness of you browser, picking an open source one would be best IMO. Among the chromium-based, there are chromium itself, brave, …

    • A7thStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      McKinsey is honestly scarier. They may not be a household name like the others, but look them up. They are frightening.

    • Kurroth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      As an Australian.Do not trust us when it comes to privacy, security especially in tech or the digital space.

      We are not a nation descendant of ‘convicts’ but of prison guards and other colonial boot lickers.

      We are US lite or US 10years ago or maybe their tearing ground. Can’t figure it out.

      • Fashim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah don’t trust us, we’ve gutted all forms of STEM that aren’t directly related to digging shit out of the ground for Gina Rinehart and co

        Serious intellectual brain drain in this country now, we really are the US 10 years ago, hopefully the US explodes enough to stop all our idiots blindly following their jingoism to our doom

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Yea I would say Usa stem is pretty neglected in some ways too, mostly the lack of career development in uni, sure you can find internships but those are rare and often hard to get for stem, additionally wet lab work is a must before graduation, and often times professors re refuse to even talk about it, because they have burned by flakey students. And it’s very limited space as well. Let’s not get started at the MS and PhD levels, whole another can of worms. You might have a better chance at a more prestigious university with more resources. Ever noticed the only successful stem are mostly foreign or/and rich people.

    • GoldenQuetzal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Glad you shared this. I hate to be That Tin Foil Hat Person but it seems really convenient that a Musk and Thiel tied CEO happens to take over the one browser base that isn’t Chromium just before people start moving to it for privacy in escalating numbers.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wonder how much this affects things if you’ve already gone through Firefox’s settings to max out privacy and turn off all telemetry.

    I resisted switching to Librewolf because Firefox works great (including M365 in Linux at work) and seemed to have the options you’d want for privacy and security.

    This doesn’t feel like an emergency, especially in a chrome/edge dominated world. But it’s back on the list of things to investigate transitioning away from.

    • coolmojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      This whole thing does not matter if you are living in the US anyway become of the Third-party doctrine that holds that people who voluntarily give information to third parties have "no reasonable expectation of privacy in that information.

  • gamer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Anyone still using Firefox after this probably hasn’t been keeping up with Mozilla’s many controversies. If this is your first time here, I can see why you’d decide to overlook it. I did for a long time, but this is the final straw for me. Luckily, instead of building anything useful over the past decades, Mozilla leadership has been instead focused on enriching themselves. That means deleting my Mozilla account right now was easy.

    I’ve now moved to LibreWolf, because I don’t want to support Chromium’s dominance, but if that project dies out I’ll jump ship. It’ll be a real shame if the world gets stuck with Chromium as the only viable browser, but it won’t be my fault. It will be Mozilla leadership’s fault.

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Jump ship to what? It seems like going to Tor browser full time might be the answer?

      I’m just not sure what the steps are from Librewolf to More private.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      It makes me sad because I’m a donator and supporter to Mozilla - and have been for years. I truly believe the web should be open, free, and not for profit and there are great people at Mozilla which is why I hate seeing the leadership do things like this. I wish there was an active group that shared the same ideals, were ethical, and not full of transphobes and cryptobros that could take up the mantle and fund another fork like Librewolf.

      Preferably would love that any group be a collective not a corporation.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t get how something is allowed to be labeled “free” when the terms of usage make you barter your data.

    • Flipper@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are different kinds of free. Free beer, free speech and free weekend are three different kinds of free that software can have, but not necessarily at the same time.

      • mhague@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I was thinking more along the lines of “install and play this free unity game while it siphons personal data off your computer and sends it back to epic servers”

        They’re specifically getting something of value in return for the good or service and then claiming it’s free and that customers are not customers, merely “users.”

    • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      dude i worked in a buncha different college libraries around the time of google’s initial ascension. Google slayed. it was awesome, in 2000.

      now? google is a drippy search engine.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s a phrase that is still very close to that in some company statement still, I sort of view it as pointless to talk about. We know they’re evil by their actions, and they were evil before they removed it in sure. If the statement is what matters, it’s still basically there, just not the motto. It’s just not worth worrying or talking about. They do so much worse shit. A friend of mine was recently let go after protesting about their response to the genocide in Gaza.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Would you like to see my tattoo of Tom from MySpace I got on my left testicle? Hey man, in 2005 it seemed like MySpace Tom would be in our lives forever. Why WOULDN’T you get his profile picture inked into your body with needles on the most painful part of your body? It made sense in 2005!

        But noooooooooo! Facebook had to be a dick. And now whenever I pull my pants down in front of some hot 20 year old with daddy issues, she’s like “Is that your uncle or something?”

        Meanwhile Tom sold my MySpace for hundreds of millions of dollars, and now does photography of bikini models on his yacht! While I have to explain who Tom is to Gen Z…

        sigh

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Honestly at this point, I wouldn’t be embarrassed having a tattoo of Tom from MySpace.

        • outdated2139@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          For a second I thought Tom did photography and bikini models on his yacht. We’ll he probably does, but I just read your comment wrong.

          • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            I mean, he’s worth hundreds of millions, on a yacht that he owns with hotties in bikinis hoping to get discovered as their own ticket to fame from the photos being taken of their oiled up sexy bodies.

            The sex was implied.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      You’re a good friend

      Edit: also the style shows through, not everyone can get a watercolor vibe without the water

      • Bizzle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s actually not watercolor, I’m just old and I don’t wear sunscreen 😂 take care of your ink, kids

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    They can’t just promise they “never will” and then get rid of it. People who used the service under the original agreement should still be able to claim that benefit since it was promising to never sell it.

  • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I haven’t been presented with any Ts and C’s. Do they apply if I already installed Firefox before this?