• pH3ra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Well Ubuntu os not that bad if you just stick to the ecosystem. I mean… Not everyone… Pffft… Wants to… HmmHMpf… Babysit… Ahahahah I can’t…

    Just install Mint

    • lengau@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      No thanks. The Mint maintainers keeping provable misinformation in their documentation despite being called out on it makes me distrust them.

        • lengau@midwest.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          https://linuxmint-user-guide.readthedocs.io/en/latest/snap.html

          Snap on the other hand, only works with the Ubuntu Store.

          It also works with any other distribution and signing mechanism you want, including signing the snap files yourself and distributing them via GitHub releases if you prefer. Snaps installed like that won’t get magically replaced with store snaps either.

          Nobody knows how to make a Snap Store and nobody can.

          There’s documentation available online, and it’s known to be usable because someone did implement their own minimal store. The project kinda died out of lack of interest though.

          I can’t find the issue I filed years ago about this (and more). They have at least made the page less filled with emotionally-charged language, though.

          • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Just by how the documentation is written, you should understand who’s its target audience: it’s clearly for new users that want to understand their philosophy.
            Is it oversimplified? Yes.
            Does this mean it’s misinformation? If I can oversimplify, then no it’s not.

            • lengau@midwest.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              It’s not oversimplified - it’s exaggerating to the point of misinformation, and it’s written more like a political screed than like documentation.

              • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                I don’t see it that way but I’m not gonna argue, since I have no horse in this race. I’m not an ubuntu hater, I actually think it’s both a good gateway to the FOSS world and a good permanent solutions for those who don’t mind a corporate approach to linux. I just find it funny to take random punches at it once in a while…

                • lengau@midwest.socialOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Humour at Ubuntu’s expense is fine, as long as it’s good natured and actually making valid criticisms about it. The problem is that low effort “lol ubuntu bad” memes don’t tend to be either of those. Moreover, documentation is not an appropriate place to make questionable political claims.

          • Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I don’t know why we’re still doing snap discourse in 2025. I’m going to be harsh and direct.

            It has a proprietary server backend. This is objectively true. Theoretically you can build an open source backend, but nobody has completed a full implementation of it.

            If you don’t care about that, you can use Ubuntu, nobody is stopping you. You don’t need other people’s approval. Which is good, because of the people who disapprove, you’re never going to get their approval until it’s actually open sourced. You’re not going to convince anybody here to stop caring that it’s proprietary. So just get over it and use your own operating system without airing your insecurities online about it.

            • lengau@midwest.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              I never said Canonical’s store isn’t proprietary. I said the statements in Mint’s anti-snap screed are factually incorrect.

              What irritates me is all the “lol ubuntu sux” posts showing me that the quality of the discourse is declining. There are valid criticisms, but there are also invalid criticisms. And the recent string of anti-Ubuntu memes has been clearly in the latter. So yeah, I will mock those, and it’s nothing to do with insecurities. Are you sure you’re not just projecting?

              • Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                The counter to low-quality “Ubuntu sux” posts is not low quality “nuh uh it’s actually super epic!!!” posts, but that’s all we ever get. I’ve seen this pattern for probably fifteen years now, and it’s exhausting. If you don’t care about the criticisms and want to keep using it, then keep using it. More power to you. I probably use things you think are garbage. Hell, Windows users think we both use garbage. I’m just tired of people desperate to justify their choices like they need to “prove” something to everyone who disagrees.

                There are plenty of high quality takedowns of Ubuntu, but so rarely are there high quality defenses of it, generally because the criticisms are correct. Nobody ever talks about what makes Ubuntu good, not even Ubuntu users. Arch users will yap your ear off about ArchWiki and AUR. I’ll evangelize Nix to anybody who will listen as the future of advanced Linux management. OpenSUSE Tumbleweed fans will not shut up about rollbacks and bleeding edge software. Fedora users… well, Fedora users are usually busy out there actually doing productive things with their time instead of pointless internet squabbles.

                But what is Ubuntu strong at? I genuinely have no idea. All I ever see Ubuntu users say is that it “sucks the least”, in some vague indescribable way. That it’s not as bad as everyone says, that Snaps are actually fine, etc. Always on the defensive. If Ubuntu is actually good, somebody needs to get out there and make a case for what it’s good at, besides being featured as the default instructions for running proprietary third-party software.

                • lengau@midwest.socialOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Okay, I’ll start. Ubuntu is good at providing a way to test and build packages for platforms you don’t necessarily have access to, for free. And because Launchpad does snap builds, that extends to those too. I have in the past used Launchpad builds to generate debugging information that solved an architecture-specific bug I wasn’t able to reproduce in QEMU and which would otherwise have remained a mystery due to my lack of access to 6 figures worth of mainframe. And I didn’t have to be an Ubuntu maintainer or anything for that. I just had to have a free Launchpad account.

              • Petter1@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                Don’t feel attacked by anti ubuntu posts

                I laugh over anti Arch / openSuse memes just as hard, if the meme based on something that is kinda true and not just some preconception or rumor.

                Thing is that a lot arch user have to struggle with ubuntu at work and see how a lot is just more complicated and harder to set up without any seeable reason. And of course, using Ubuntu feels like using a PC with your parents in the back warning you about any shit you already have done 1000 times.

                • lengau@midwest.socialOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I don’t feel attacked by them, I feel irritated by some of them. The ones that irritate me are ones that repeat misinformation or otherwise harm the discourse, and that goes for memes that attack any distro like that.

                  Funny enough, arch is a distro I can’t stand because of the (IMO) backwards and stupid ways it does a lot of things, making it harder to set up without any good reason. But I’m not out there spamming the place with “lol arch sux” memes about that.

  • Petter1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Lol, Reddit has nothing to do with ubuntu just being crap.

    But as snap lover… I see all hope is lost in you.

    (This is a meme community, please don’t take me too serious)

  • theluckyone@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ve used Gentoo on my main desktop for decades.

    Anything else in the house gets Kubuntu on it, 'cause ain’t nobody got time for that.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve never considered Gentoo as an unironic daily driver on desktops - more like embedded systems/learning the ropes of Linux kinda thing.

      What made you choose Gentoo in particular?

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not OP, but it’s amazing to choose which parts of your software don’t enter compilation at all.

        Also it’s rock solid, had fewer issues than Lubuntu, can use OpenRC or systemd.

        But I haven’t learned as much about Linux as I hoped. The distro just works, and I love everything about it.

      • theluckyone@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        My initial attempts at running Linux as a daily threw me off. Had a couple Comp Sci friends in college recommend switching, but they led me to distros with pre-compiled binaries and installation wizards. I’d install, get dumped out at a desktop, then ask “And what do I do now?”. I had no idea how the filesystem was organized, etc.

        I stumbled across LinuxFromScratch somehow. Took a few months and ran through the installation three times before I felt I had a good handle on what was going on. Then I tried to tackle compiling X.org and all its dependencies, learning exactly why a package manager is useful.

        That lead me to Gentoo. I haven’t found a problem running it in the last ~20 years that I couldn’t solve, so I’ve stuck with it. Now it’s just comfortable. I’ve slapped other distributions on other boxes (Mint, Kubuntu, etc), and even on laptops for family members, but they don’t feel like home.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t love Ubuntu as a desktop, but i’ll fight to let other people try it and make up their own minds.

    We have rather substantial tribe mind going on with anti AI, linux distros that suck, and which browsers are awful.

    We’ve had hivemind since forever, but it’s starting to get more pronounced.

  • abcdqfr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    You either use the distro for its specific use case and suffer as you overreach into other areas of expertise or get comfy switching gears if you need hybrid tasks on minimal hardware

      • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        If you use it wrong, sure. There’s a use for almost anything; just gotta figure out what’s appropriate.

        Ubuntu is perfect for my non-technical, 76 year old father to run his own plex server where I don’t have to help too much.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yeah no it does suck it made me think the Linux experience was at least 3x worse before I tried another distro.

    And not just a DE thing, every part of the distro feels like it was slapped on without actually thinking of the consequences.

    • netplan
    • apt
    • default systemd dependencies
    • ubuntu GNOME
    • snap
    • ubuntu pro
    • cloudinit conf

    You can find forums and docs from as old as Fedora 11 that’s still relevant yet Ubuntu utterly fails to keep consistency across a single version update because they changed something that’s only mentioned in the changelog.

    Every downstream of Ubuntu is essentially focused on removing all the BS the upstream has so you can use your computer without something breaking like it’s Arch.

    There is no right answer to the correct distro, only a wrong answer, and that is Ubuntu because practically anything else including its downstreams like LM are better for you as a user.

    • Semperverus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      without something breaking like its arch

      I have had seven full-system failures across the last two decades using Ubuntu that could not easily be troubleshooted and fixed.

      I have had exactly zero with Arch.

      Take that as you will.

    • hangonasecond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I had similar bad luck with Linux mint. So many things just didn’t work, or didn’t work correctly. Wifi issues, sound issues, graphics issues, issues setting up particular things for software development. I’ve switched to NixOS and I’m having a much easier time. A significant amount of my improved experience could be attributed to more patience or just an improved ability to deal with problems. I also suspect cinnamon was causing some of my problems, somehow whereas now I have GNOME on my main rig and lxqt on my laptop.

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I personally think Ubuntu sucks, thats why I always reccomend other distros to people starting :3

    Productivity: Debian (you dont need up to date packages if all you do is edit documents)

    Gaming: Pop_OS (especially when Cosmic releases)

  • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I like Ubuntu, use it as my main laptop os, and main server’s os for a production system that’s been upgraded through 3 LTS versions without issue. Three.

    I don’t think windows can do that, at all.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Have you ever upgraded the Ubuntu laptop? Cause that’s my main gripe with Ubuntu. Server upgrades work, desktop upgrades never did for me.

      • lengau@midwest.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I can’t speak for plain Ubuntu, but I’ve got desktops running both Kubuntu and KDE Neon that have been upgraded version to version for over a decade now. (Ok I lie. The Kubuntu one is a laptop.)

      • Goingdown@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Have you ever upgraded the Ubuntu laptop? Cause that’s my main gripe with Ubuntu. Server upgrades work, desktop upgrades never did for me.

        I wonder about this. I have been running Ubuntu on one of my laptops for years, and updated it several times withouth hitch. All the way from around 18.10 to 22.04 (non-lts, so I upgraded to every release) until the laptop was replaced.

        Usually the breakage happens if one has tons of shitty third-party repos and thus will get package conflicts when upgrading. And those are solved by removing/replacing all software installed from those repos and then after upgrade reinstalling them again if needed.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    it’s the “Reddit hivemind” when a large group shares their opinion that your OS of choice has many flaws, but a large group of people defending their poor choices in OS is…not “hivemind” mentality?

    it’s amazing honestly, the amount of mental gymnastics we go through to protect our fragile egos because we honestly believe a corporate product will somehow enrich our lives to the point that they will suck less.

    if only we could get past this and objectively look at the tools as tools and be able to have an open discussion about why they suck.

    but no…let’s keep denigrating each other so that our side will come out victorious.

    in another post I triggered the whole community so much that a mod had to step in, the irony of my commentary completely lost on everyone. it would be amusing if it weren’t so sad that there’s so much useless emotion wrapped up in this argument.

    • lengau@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      “Don’t feed the trolls” has ended up with the trolls running the place. I’d rather Lemmy not become yet another “lol ubuntu sux” echo chamber.

      • yokonzo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Why would it? It’s already an echo chamber for Linux as a whole, so I really, really doubt that’s going to happen

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yeah, I don’t get the hate and intentional division being sowed there.

    I’m not a fan of Ubuntu since they went all Thanos Snap (the final straw was replacing deb packages in apt with snap stubs), but I can applaud that they’re using Linux.

    Just seems like low effort, pointless gatekeeping to me.

    • Kroxx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah I never understood the hate but today I did read a comment saying Canonical (the company that develops Ubuntu) had injected some amazon telemetry into one of the search functionalities, that and using Snap is what makes some people shit on it. I didn’t verify the telemetry thing FYI.

      I can definitely understand people being upset at telemetry injections.

      The above is to say I don’t think it’s exclusively people gate keeping, dome people have legitimate issues with it.I haven’t seen people shit on mint a lot and it’s an easy distro. Honestly most people are super supportive of mint. That being said there is definitely some amount of gatekeeping.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        That was the point where I stopped using it.

        They included a global search function which in a default installation sent your search terms to Amazon and returned search results from them.
        It also sent them to a web search (with real time results while you typed, including image previews). So it was possible to get shown NSFW images accidentally inside your OS, without opening a browser.
        It was just really bad design, and a heavy-handed attempt of monetizing their OS.

        Of course that could all be removed with a bash one-liner, but it showed where Canonical was headed,

    • lengau@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Configuring Kubuntu for my liking is way easier than configuring mint for my liking, and some of that mint configuration is going out of the way to undo things the mint maintainers did intentionally.

      • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Then you chose right! Regarding Ubuntu I have been using it for work VMs and it’s adequate, my current annoyance is that you can’t easily change the UI colours to distinguish different projects, because it’s not the “Ubuntu way”, maybe I’ll find a hack.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Mint not officially shipping with KDE is a source of my personal frustration. Would have checked it out more thoroughly otherwise.

        • skooma_king@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          (I didn’t downvote you, just fyi, don’t know why someone would)

          I personally have no issues with x11 if i’m using just one monitor, but if I use two or more I have nothing but issues. I am a tired sysadmin and don’t want to fight my personal equipment at home.

          • atlas@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            same and never had an issue with x11. two monitors at different resolutions and different refresh rates.

            • Semperverus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              You haven’t noticed the issue then. X11 tends to run everything at the lowest common denominator, and doesn’t allow per-monitor scaling.