• grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    It’s worth noting you’re only allowed to insultingly say someone has a mental illness in relation to their gender or sexual orientation.

    Do not post … Insults, including those about: … Mental characteristics, including but not limited to allegations of stupidity, intellectual capacity, and mental illness, and unsupported comparisons between PC groups on the basis of inherent intellectual capacity. We do allow allegations of mental illness or abnormality when based on gender or sexual orientation, given political and religious discourse about transgenderism and homosexuality and common non-serious usage of words like “weird.”

    Source: https://transparency.meta.com/policies/community-standards/hateful-conduct/

    Edit: and the changelog is a hoot.

  • AustralianSimon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I think the big reason they are allowing it is because they got to cut the entire cost of having moderation with an external vendor. Not because they have an agenda or anything. Its pure dollars.

    • metaldream@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Nah it’s clearly ideological when you look at the details of their new moderation policies. They now allow you to call people crazy, but only if it’s because they’re LGBT.

      • AustralianSimon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I don’t think so. Zuck never cared about people, he’s cut-throat, egotistical and money/power focussed. He wouldn’t take the time for thinking about insulting the little people (non-millionaires). He’s done it to encourage more users to use the platform and create disputes/content which is cold hard cash to him. Remember when they experimented with users by showing them content that would trigger them to make them interact?

  • AidsKitty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s freedom of speech. Being able to say what you want and suffer the consequences of your decisions is what it is all about.

    • metaldream@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Oh you mean like specifically disallowing people from calling someone crazy unless that person is gay or trans? How the fuck is that “free speech”?

      I can post some violent fantasy online and meta won’t allow you to call me crazy for it, but if you call me crazy because you think I’m gay that’s just fine?

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Except it’s not really “freedom of speech?” You can’t normally say someone is mentally ill - the verbiage is that you can specifically only call LGBT people mentally ill.

  • DegenerateSupreme@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    I feel conflicted. On one hand, people can regulate themselves, and Facebook becoming a bigoted cesspit may bring more people to a moderated Fediverse.

    On the other hand, these major platforms having such user monopoly and influence can cause unfettered hate speech to breed violence.

    I’m conflicted about the idea that an insidious for-profit megacorporation should be expected to uphold a moral responsibility to prevent violence; their failure to do so might be a necessary wake-up call that ultimately strips them of that problematic influence. Thoughts?

    • Sconrad122@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      Accelerationism is ultimately burning the vulnerable at the stake to try and send a smoke signal, so I think it’s hard to say that this is a positive development. We can hope that there is a silver lining here where corporate social media self selects itself out of the general populations’ lives, but I think we probably have to be realistic about the low probability of success here and the human cost that is incurred in the meantime

  • yoshisaur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    169
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    8 days ago

    My mom believes the bullshit about LGBTQ being a mental illness. Can’t wait for it to get worse! Thanks Facebook!

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I find homophobia to be a mental illness. I mean it’s right there in the name.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    greed is a mental illness.

    billionaires are greedy.

    the rich are a plague upon society and must be quarantined.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Billionaires have mental illness and have negatively affected me and society as a whole more than any gay or trans person ever could.

    • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Immense wealth is not compatible with the moral life. It’s also not compatible with Christianity, but I don’t think any of them truly care about religion. The drive for greed should be a mental illness, especially when it’s at the cost of empathy.

      • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        “And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.”

    • cowfodder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yup, and if you reported it as hate speech they’d review it and say it doesn’t go against community guidelines.

      • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 days ago

        And then YOU get banned for “abusing the report feature”.

        Reported a blatantly bigoted post saying that all gays should be burnt alive and I got a 30 day account suspension.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s just they’re updating their terms now that Trump is in power. Hate started to rise since the beginning of GenAI on the platform, I highly suspect due to the backlash from socially progressive people against it, and techbros didn’t appreciate that. They’re going mask off now after the elections.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah the left wants things that actually hinder the oligarchs, the right wants to complain about them but will settle for people they don’t like being hurt. Tech companies understand that.

        There’s also the fact that the bay area has spent quite a while having the sort of people who love to treat equal rights as a thought exercise

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    8 days ago

    As far as internet content goes, hate is winning. All the major social media platforms have been overrun by sexist, racist, LGBTQphobic commentary. And these platforms will simply follow the money, pushing hate content via algorithms as good people leave the platforms.

    • hushable@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      And these platforms will simply follow the money

      This, remember that every single pride sponsorship and rainbow coloured logo was approved by a marketing department after extensive market research deeming it to be profitable

    • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Make two Reddit accounts, one saying “I love trans people” and one saying “I hate trans people”. I bet the latter will get banned first.

  • Tronn4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    When we start to say “bad things” about the oligarchy watch hoe fast they shut that down

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      The problem with western oligarchs is that they rarely step foot on public land …so it’s really hard to track their schedules let alone get a shoot shot off.

      • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        A fun non-lethal approach is to just try to sabotage their planes while they’re on the ground. Shooting a hole in the window of a flying aircraft, generally frowned upon. Shooting a hole in a billionaire’s sky yacht while it’s empty in it’s hangar…well that’s just property damage that happens to prevent them from poisoning the atmosphere.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      7 days ago

      Never has been:

      According to the text messages, Zuckerberg wrote, “Yeah, so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard, just ask me. I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS.”

      In response, a friend inquired, “What? How did you manage to obtain all that?”

      To which Zuckerberg callously replied, “People just submitted it. I don’t know why they ‘trust me.’ Dumb f****.”

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    They put Dana White who heads the UFC on the board, all because Zuckerberg did Jujitsu… Jujitsu and the UFC has stange political affiliations to chechen forces Putin sometimes employs.

    They’re a hyper masculine male traditionalist culture. So it all ties back into that BS.

    They call it “Sportswashing” - using Jujitsu to slide extremist politics onto someone. Zuckerberg fell tor it hook line and sinker. Libertarian to pro Russia pipeline. Anti-woke fascism in practice.

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      As a MMA enjoyer, Dana White being put in charge of anything is fucking scary. He is an extremely evil and ruthless man. He is so open about treating fighters like complete shit saying “its better to keep them hungry because then they are more motivated to preform”.

      Dana is at the forefront of Saudi sportswashing and pushing right wing culture on young men. He hooked trump up with Nelk and got Trump infront of massive influencers and their audiences.

      Hearing Zuck speak longform a few years ago I actually thought he was left leaning and a reasonable guy. But that was bullshit, the guys morals are about as strong as a wet paper bag.

  • lepetitchien@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Fuck Meta and Zuck. I wish I could stop using WhatsApp, as every other Meta product is out of my devices already.

    • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 days ago

      I wish our government actually regulated these corporations so they are not able to have a tentacle in so many essential technologies.

      All of the symptoms of the crushing power of techbro oligarchs are directly tied to failures of govt to regulate.

      • ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        This has been true since “sign in with Facebook” became a thing.

        I think with Brazil banning Xitter, and I reckon Starmer might too given how much Musk has attacked him, it might be come more of a thing.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Every journey needs a first step.

      Try to convince some of your contacts to use something else. Repeat until a large chunk of your contacts are available outside WhatsApp, and make yourself increasingly harder to access through WhatsApp and increasingly easier to access on your preferred alternative.