• webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    As i have said elsewhere, i regret mixing up the terminology, which frankly i am quite embarrassed about.

    I am not refuting the knowledge that the universe expands. I was speaking on the common anecdote that “in the beginning there was nothing and then it exploded and thats how the universe began” which is how it was initially explained to me and what the majority of people seem to understand and take for absolute truth.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It’s ok, I attack these misconceptions as much for readers and browsers as to clear up anything for the commenters. I don’t mean to sound heavy, but too many people leverage common misconceptions into full-on anti-science conspirism.

      “in the beginning there was nothing and then it exploded and thats how the universe began”

      The people who explain it like this need a good slappin’, it’s not at all accurate. In fact, it’s the opposite of what happened (as far as we know.)

      what do you get when you compress an infinite universe? An infinite universe of compressed energy and matter.

      The universe was in it’s early state, as far as we can surmise, infinite in density and mass, but it wasn’t “small” and we have no way to know what came before this state. But the short of it is, everything came into being from a state where everything was super dense and hot, then the space itself got bigger so the hot stuff started moving apart from each other. There was never “nothing” as far as we can tell.