• Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    MySQL belongs to Oracle. That’s literally all you need to.know in order to avoid it.

    • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      13 days ago

      Isn’t that the point of Postgresql. It’s basically an open source version of MySQL.

      I’m sure there are some proprietary nonsense that MySQL has, but I’ve never needed it in 17 years

      • sobchak@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        13 days ago

        Postgres is basically an open source version of Oracle DB. Much more featureful than MySQL. I believe Oracle bought MySQL just to kill it.

        • msage@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          13 days ago

          MySQL always sucked ass.

          PostgreSQL went in a different direction, started with best support of the SQL standard, then optimized everything to make it fast.

          Postgres has/had the best SQL standard support out of every server, open-source or not.

          MySQL was at the other end, only started catching up after Oracle bought it.

      • Jajcus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        13 days ago

        That is an insult to PostgreSQL. PostgreSQL was fully featured relational database even before it implemented SQL. It started much earlier tha MySQL.

        And MySQL didn’t have proper transactions or data integrity constraints (including foreign keys) for long time, while calling itself an ‘SQL database’.

        • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          Thank you, I never had time to read up on its history when I was busy smashing out sites on stupid deadlines with constant last minute changes and morons for project managers.

        • msage@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          13 days ago

          What do you mean?

          Stop DB, run pg_upgrade, start it, win?

          Or set up logical replication into newer version, wait for sync, test use-cases, switch write?

          Where do you get better experience?

  • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    13 days ago

    If you don’t want to use postgresql for some obscure reason use MariaDB real open source MySQL drop in replacement.

  • melfie@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Oracle sees itself as an activist organization, one whose goal is the advancement of the Israeli colonization project. Safra Catz, the company’s Israeli-American CEO, bluntly explained that any employees uncomfortable with supporting a genocide should simply quit. “We are not flexible regarding our mission, and our commitment to Israel is second to none” (source)

    Hmm, MySQL or PostgreSQL—how will we ever decide which one to pick.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 days ago

      wow, I didn’t need any more reasons not to support Oracle but thanks anyway

  • 800XL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    13 days ago

    What year is this? No one should be using Mysql since MariaDB came about.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          SQLite is underrated. I’ve used it for high traffic systems with no issues. If your system has a large number of readers and a small number of writers, it performs very well. It’s not as good for high-concurrency write-heavy use cases, but that’s not common (most apps read far more than they write).

          My use case was a DB that was created during the build process, then read on every page load.

            • dan@upvote.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              One of SQLite’s recommended use cases is as an alternate to proprietary binary formats: https://sqlite.org/appfileformat.html. Programs often store data in binary files for performance, but you get a lot of the same functionality included with SQLite (fast random access, concurrent usage, atomicity, updates that don’t need to rewrite the whole file, etc) without having to implement a file format yourself.

              I’m not sure if this is still the case, but Facebook’a HHVM used to store the compiled bytecode for the whole site in a single SQLite database: https://docs.hhvm.com/docs/hhvm/advanced-usage/repo-authoritative/. Every pageload loaded the bytecode for all required files from the DB.

        • FackCurs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Oh no… it was the easy solution for Wordpress and other plug and play self hosted services .

        • alibloke@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          The corporation was bought by k1 capital. The foundation and therefore the open source version will always be free

    • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      Older people about to return to programming, and most of the online tutorials they have are about 20 years old, having no idea an alternative exists.

    • Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yeah,
      I did a speed test comparison between Oracle MySQL and MariaDB MySQL,
      MariaDB is about 10 times faster.

      FYI: When Oracle bought MySQL a lot of developers left and created MariaDB, so the brains behind the project moved, and in the meantime Oracle did a great job of fucking things up.

    • kumi@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Operating and securing Postgres is a steeper learning curve. MariaDB is more forgiving for best-effort shoestring setups without compensating scalability for it.

      As a dev I’m agnostic, as an owner and computer scientiest I prefer Postgres, as a sysadmin or *Ops I will put my hand up for MariaDB any day if I’ll be on call or maintain deployments.

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Is Maria that much better than MySQL?

        Cause that one is absolute shit, very difficult to maintain, and requires lots of config changes and even replicas can disconnect when something’s not 100% ok.

        I will take Postgres over any other DB any day of the week.

    • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      If you’re constrained by resources (CPU/RAM).

      There’s a reason most web hosts usually have mariadb and not postgres.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Maybe that once every 2 years when you upgrade to major version it does it automatically? You save 15 mins every 2 years?

    • illusionist@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      Depends on the task but for general usage there is no big difference. You would choose one over the other if you need one for work.

    • Roguelazer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      MySQL often has moderately higher performance (particularly for workloads where you want your data clustered by PK, which is how InnoDB is natively structured) and its replication system is much more flexible than either of PostgreSQL’s. I like Percona personally, but MariaDB is fine too.

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Is it true?

        Postgres with correct fillfactor, it doesn’t create new pages and works very fast.

        Replication in MySQL always sucked ass, only received synchronous replication in some new edition, and that also didn’t sound great.

        Postgres has logstream and logical replication, both of them can be set to various levels of synchronicity, and logical replication is configurable at least as well as MySQL is in terms of which data is sent.

  • MrSoup@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    MariaDB >>>

    I’ve been using it since ever on my rpi because they say it’s easier on resources

    • YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 days ago

      Who are “they”?

      We use MariaDB at work but I don’t know why it was originally chosen over PostgreSQL, as that was before my time.

      • MrSoup@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        Blogs and forums back then when I looked it up.
        Can’t remember exactly where (since it’s been a long time ago), but I’m sure more than someone claimed it.