I got in a political argument with some clown on Facebook. He managed to retrieve my wife’s cell phone number and our home phone which is unlisted and technically just provided by our Internet company that we never use.

None our personal info is really available on Facebook and our profiles are pretty locked down, but he called my wife’s phone a few times last week which she has blocked and never answers. Comes up as anonymous on her id.

He tried our home phone 16 times which I ignored, everything stopped, he called again tonight. I decided to answer. He said he knows where I live my wife and daughters name, and our address. He never gave out that though and that he is coming to kill us. Said that on the line

I have called my local police department. But this is rural Nebraska they said they can’t do anything or have our phone companies run a trace.

Is there anything I can do to figure out who this guy is?

  • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This. This. A thousand times a thousand times, yes. Nobody should be blindly trusting their safety to Amazon, one of the worst abusers of trust and privacy.

    (Plus they’re the most common hardware… Guess what’s getting targeted for mass exploits?)

    Almost anything is better than giving Amazon access to your home.

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The only thing worse than giving info to Amazon, is having no security for your home. I have a ring camera that was a gift from my previous employer when I moved states and I’m very glad to have it. It faces my street, where anybody can see anyways so privacy is not a concern. I’d never put ring cameras inside or in the rear of my house, and would rather not use ring but given what a life saver it has been since i bought my house several times, i will not be doin without until I can replace with a offline system. But being able to check in at work is nice, and any security is better than no security. Hell just bolting an old cctv camera to the side of your house without hooking it up is better than nothing.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        That ring camera is still absolutely a privacy threat, if not to you, than to your neighbors. Ring is partnering with flock on mass surveillance with facial recognition. That camera belongs to ICE just as much as it belongs to you, if not more since they can have AI “watch” it 24x7.

        • innermachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Right and what are they gonna do with the information that I am or aren’t home? That I got oil delivered? That some random prick was banging on my door a few weeks ago? It’s on the front of my house covering my driveway and the street. Anybody can hop on Google maps and see what my camera sees right now lmfao. Like I said I’d never get one in my back yard or in my house, but I’d rather have big brothers eyes on my driveway than none! And my mom was born in Venezuela so let ice pull up they’ll see what the 2nd A is for.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            You don’t get it. It’s not about just one camera. They have the whole network and can run facial recognition and licence plate readers (that go well beyond just reading plates) across all of it. They don’t just know that you left your house, they can track everywhere you go. Some courts have made that illegal for cops to do, so they just outsourced it.

            Your camera is just a small piece, but it’s a piece you control. Nobody should be throwing that shit up to the cloud. It’s incredibly damaging to any kind of civil resistance movement. Stalin could only have dreamed of the kind of mass surveillance that Americans are just freely providing to our oligarchy. It’s fucking dumb.

            • innermachine@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              This is a flawed argument. Your walking around with a phone in ur pocket, they don’t need your camera to track you. That and just about every intersection has a camera on it. The network to track you has so many more data points than my ring camera. They track every penny you spend, where you work, where you buy groceries, the porn you watch. Yea my camera is contributing to mass surveillance, but as long as you own a cell phone getting rid of your ring camera isn’t going to help you the way you might think. If you want to stop mass surveillance you need to boondock on public lands. Once you own anything and get connected to the internet, it’s game over!

              • Tinidril@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                I choose to carry my phone in my pocket, and I can choose not to carry it. I can even choose to have someone else carry it north while I go south.

                I can go anywhere in my city on foot or a bike and be entirely untracked by anything, except those damn doorbell cameras. At most I might be picked up by a traffic camera or two, but I can do any number of things to not be recognized, but not if they can follow my movements back to my house. Those cameras fill the last gaps of untracked freedom of movement.

                • innermachine@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  44 minutes ago

                  While I see your point, I will say there is no such thing as freedom of movement in any city anymore. Every business you pass, every intersection, every few street lamps (depending on ur city) will be monitored by camera. Every major roadway is camera monitored in or out of a city (check ur local 411 traffic cams). In any urban area trying to minimize your contribution to mass surveillance is in vain, it’s already been taken care of by the govt and businesses and what we consume! It just seems to be a product of being in a technologically advanced society. What needs to happen is more restrictions on those performing the mass surveillance, although I doubt they’d listen even if our govt tried to restrict them.