Through a natural push towards the adult version of anarchy. I don’t think all of the ideas wrestled with in Marxism-Leninism are wrong or off base, I just think it’s assinine to call something that still has demonstrably separated and elevated rulers “communism” or particularly great.
Just like a lot of outright socialists don’t necessarily like to be directly mixed in with democratic socialists, I think the communists who do not make a distinction for the very much not communist parts of Marxism-Leninism are only serving a gross lack of nuance and doing a disservice to a huge part of the goals of communism.
Anarchism isn’t communism, though, it’s its own thing. Administration is not against communism. Further, I have no idea what you mean by “a natural push,” the basis of communism is in large-scale industry and not in small communalism. I also don’t know what you mean by “the very much not communist parts of Marxism-Leninism,” you don’t define this nor elaborate on where you’re getting your ideas about communism from. The fact that socialist states have had administrators does not make them “rulers,” nor does it imply they form a distinct class.
Through a natural push towards the adult version of anarchy. I don’t think all of the ideas wrestled with in Marxism-Leninism are wrong or off base, I just think it’s assinine to call something that still has demonstrably separated and elevated rulers “communism” or particularly great.
Just like a lot of outright socialists don’t necessarily like to be directly mixed in with democratic socialists, I think the communists who do not make a distinction for the very much not communist parts of Marxism-Leninism are only serving a gross lack of nuance and doing a disservice to a huge part of the goals of communism.
Anarchism isn’t communism, though, it’s its own thing. Administration is not against communism. Further, I have no idea what you mean by “a natural push,” the basis of communism is in large-scale industry and not in small communalism. I also don’t know what you mean by “the very much not communist parts of Marxism-Leninism,” you don’t define this nor elaborate on where you’re getting your ideas about communism from. The fact that socialist states have had administrators does not make them “rulers,” nor does it imply they form a distinct class.
I hope you grow to a point where you can look back on this comment and appreciate what a word salad it is.