Like the worst thing you could possibly choose when it comes to verification.

Could you suggest alternative verification methods?

Providing you trust Intel SGX (and AWS for giving them access to actual SGX and not just emulating a compromised instruction set)

😃

conspiracy begins…

What is PhilZ Touch? I have never heard of it, and TWRP isn’t near OrangeFox.

OrangeFox is superior; it has many features, such as:

• Advanced File Manager
• Password Protection
• Flashing and managing root directly from recovery
• App Manager and Module Manager

And unlike TWRP, it’s well maintained

https://signal.org/blog/private-contact-discovery/

Since the enclave attests to the software that’s running remotely, and since the remote server and OS have no visibility into the enclave, the service learns nothing about the contents of the client request. It’s almost as if the client is executing the query locally on the client device.

Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Signal is easy to use, and that is what really protects millions of people. Otherwise, they would never use a complex or decentralized alternative.

The actual quote is: “Perfect is the enemy of good enough.”

Source?

The only data they store are account creation time and last connection time.

https://signal.org/bigbrother/district-of-columbia/

Can you access any settings page like accessibility?

Great for newcomers, especially in restricted regions.

Can someone explain how they do this verification?

“Protect Children” !

why no comments?

that’s a good starting point!

But there weren’t that many bugs.

Microsoft should start scratch

If you really care about privacy maybe try an Android with a private cusrom ROM

App info --> data usage

I read them, and there is no proof of “selling user data”; it’s just assumptions.

No one asked for that

If your banking doesn’t allow you to use their website, switch banks, because that means they don’t give a fuck about you

I just did that and it’s so simple