Saapas

They’re probably getting desperate about their market share

I was using the addons I need on my Android Firefox. That part was great. I think most of my issues were more due to the browser engine lacking behind on Android and just feeling janky compared to how smooth and well functioning Chromium based browsers were.

I’ve tried a few Firefox forks on Android here and there and it was usually a few improvements here and there but overall the experience was similar.

A big recent issue was that Firefox initially loaded for a really long time so doing a quick search was anmoying the first time I launched it. Another issue was how often Firefox was killed in the background. That’s partly due to Xiaomi and Android, but for whatever reason even mega bloated chromium browers don’t do that. Then bunch of small issues like browser theme not changing with the rest of the system or changing partially that suddenly I had white on white or black on black and I had to kill Firefox to fix the issue. The Android experience has always been janky for me with FF and I’ve used it for idk as long as I remember it being on Android

I recently got into Vivaldy myself and was bummed to find that out

Rubber boots are actually a different company too, Nokian Jalkineet Oy and it’s owned by Berner

I’ve recently switched to Vivaldi on Android because Firefox was constantly just janky for me. Now I’m testing it on Linux too, the included email client is a great perk. Too bad it is not fully open source (the UI stuff is proprietary).

Vivaldi mail requires you to be an “active community member” in the Vivaldi community

Tuta and Proton are a no-go for me for free tier (or at all) allowing me to use third party software for their email. I like to use Thunderbird and Vivaldi’s email client to combine my inboxes. Unfortunately that doesn’t work with Proton and Tuta.

What’s with all the 30-yos with back problems like that’s not an age where you’re supposed to have a bad back yet lol

You’ve read Caesar’s works too??

I love these posts on LinkedIn. Tbh I love the similar serious posts too singe they’re so unhinged

They might have some rule about carding everyone

Exactly. Just have a system that has basically no other info than “they had a valid token showing they’re 18”. Nobody does anything with that info if there’s a data breach.

I wonder how different Linux distros are going to implement this

Incompetence is one big reason why current style systems are just a no-go for me.

That’s really what the whole rest of my reply was about. We need a system more like carding and less like giving them copy of your passport.

>Microsoft triggered a viral furor when it revealed a Teams update to tell your company when you’re not at work.

This is the funniest thing, people mad that Teams tracks if you’re actually doing work lol

It was just a bit much with the different aspects of it

I’m not against proper age verifications as such, it would be like carding people in a store or a bar. But I just haven’t seen an implementation of it that isn’t prone to being a privacy nightmare and surveillance state shit.

I know there’s some systems that generate a token that verify that you are 18 and you give that to the site, so neither side directly meet so to say. The site knows only that you have a valid token for being 18 and the app or service you use to generate the token knows just that you wanted to token for something. I think Spain was figuring out a system like that.

Your disagreement with the analysts and the articles has been noted. I don’t think there’s anything else to do here than agree to disagree.

You don’t think it fits, but the sources in the article certainly do.

Moreover, Wikipedia is saying some analysts, not even taking a definitive stance itself.

Wikipedia uses that sort of wording pretty often

I know you disagree with the analysts. I was just posting this to show that maybe the view on Wikipedia doesn’t align with you after all, in actual words or in “cut off” extra definitions.

Wikipedia is a very popular site that usually uses very common definitions as their basis. That’s why I originally used it.